VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Barnwell Industries has a net margin of 91.93% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -42.82%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34% beat Barnwell Industries's return on equity of -46.11%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.87, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Barnwell Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Barnwell Industries.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries has a beta of -0.221, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.083%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Barnwell Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $228.5M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M is higher than Barnwell Industries's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while Barnwell Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.54x versus 0.68x for Barnwell Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CKX Lands has a net margin of 91.93% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 17.81%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 1.36%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.87, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of -0.128, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.798%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $228.5M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $180.6K. Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $32.2K. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 101.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.54x versus 15.06x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 91.93% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 29.06%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.87, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.38 which suggests that it could grow by 38.48%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Viper Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Viper Energy.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $228.5M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.54x versus 2.65x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 91.93% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of --. Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.87, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 53.78%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Viper Energy, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Viper Energy.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $228.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M is higher than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.54x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.