ULTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 10.71% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 8.33%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $476.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.52%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $205.97 which suggests that it could grow by 16.54%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.122%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 12.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.88x versus 1.07x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 10.71% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 4.24%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.53%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $476.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.52%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 6.8%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M is higher than Five Below's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Five Below's PE ratio is 25.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.88x versus 1.66x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a net margin of 10.71% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 4.44%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14% beat Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.87%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $476.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.52%. On the other hand Sally Beauty Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.51%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.03%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sally Beauty Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sally Beauty Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues of $883.1M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M is higher than Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $39.2M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Sally Beauty Holdings's PE ratio is 4.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.88x versus 0.24x for Sally Beauty Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of 10.71% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of -8.53%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $476.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.52%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.20 which suggests that it could fall by -23.08%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.829%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $249.1M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.88x versus 0.13x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.