SPWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bath & Body Works has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 16.25%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.39% beat Bath & Body Works's return on equity of --.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 38.1%. On the other hand Bath & Body Works has an analysts' consensus of $43.56 which suggests that it could grow by 29.38%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Bath & Body Works, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Bath & Body Works.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.870, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.951%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bath & Body Works offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works pays out 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are smaller than Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$8.7M is lower than Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bath & Body Works's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.07x versus 1.02x for Bath & Body Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -9.82%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.39% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 38.1%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 194.12%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.669%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 31.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$8.7M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.07x versus 0.04x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 7.7%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.39% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 38.1%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $223.56 which suggests that it could grow by 5.43%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.461%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$8.7M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 15.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.07x versus 1.31x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GHST World has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -938.3%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.39% beat GHST World's return on equity of --.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 38.1%. On the other hand GHST World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than GHST World, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than GHST World.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GHST World has a beta of -0.033, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.253%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GHST World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GHST World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than GHST World quarterly revenues of $4.9K. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$8.7M is lower than GHST World's net income of -$45.7K. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GHST World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.07x versus 143.20x for GHST World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.