UG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of -14.74%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $76.48 which suggests that it could grow by 14.97%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.679%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $4B. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.72x versus 1.58x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of -0.44%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 5.91%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of $36.13 which suggests that it could grow by 19.03%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.964%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $478.4M. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is higher than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.72x versus 0.67x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 6.7%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.75%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.36%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.62%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $361.5M. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is lower than Interparfums's net income of $24.2M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 24.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.72x versus 2.82x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 21.16%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.78 which suggests that it could grow by 6.43%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.218%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.72x versus 4.91x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.