TRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Woodmark has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of 6.39%. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87%.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.93%. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of $70.33 which suggests that it could grow by 35.39%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than American Woodmark.

TriMas has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.87%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are smaller than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $400.4M. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is lower than American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.12x while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 8.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.18x versus 0.46x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of 2.26%. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.93%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.82%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

TriMas has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.311%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.12x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.18x versus 0.41x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of -3528.43%. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.93%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

TriMas has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.12x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.18x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of --. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.93%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Northann.

TriMas has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.12x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.18x versus 0.38x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.