TRMK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Regions Financial has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 27.47%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.25, signalling upside risk potential of 23.73%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $24.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.93%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.377%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.27x versus 2.61x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 25.65%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's return on equity of 5.64%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.25, signalling upside risk potential of 23.73%. On the other hand Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has an analysts' consensus of $28.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.1%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.49%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida pays out 50.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.27x versus 3.92x for Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simmons First National has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 15.45%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Simmons First National's return on equity of 4.18%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.25, signalling upside risk potential of 23.73%. On the other hand Simmons First National has an analysts' consensus of $21.60 which suggests that it could grow by 16.88%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Simmons First National, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Simmons First National.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simmons First National has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.581%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Simmons First National offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Simmons First National pays out 69.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Simmons First National quarterly revenues of $209.6M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Simmons First National's net income of $32.4M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Simmons First National's PE ratio is 15.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.27x versus 2.99x for Simmons First National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 22.17%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 5.51%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.25, signalling upside risk potential of 23.73%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 21.65%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Valley National Bancorp, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Valley National Bancorp.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.268%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 65.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $478.4M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $106.1M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.27x versus 2.44x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.