TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of -2.86%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.14%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.274%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 39.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.67x versus 1.56x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 81.39%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.14%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.665%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.67x versus 2.70x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 10.78%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.14%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.52%. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Itron.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.76%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Itron's PE ratio is 22.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.67x versus 2.30x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 5.56%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat MKS's return on equity of 9.72%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.14%. On the other hand MKS has an analysts' consensus of $116.34 which suggests that it could grow by 30.18%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS has a beta of 1.840, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.996%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. MKS offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are smaller than MKS quarterly revenues of $936M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than MKS's net income of $52M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while MKS's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.67x versus 1.66x for MKS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.