ITRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Itron's net margin of -2.86%. Itron's return on equity of 18.23% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.91, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Itron has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.274%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $607.2M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Itron's net income of $65.5M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 39.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 2.30x versus 1.56x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Itron's net margin of 1.09%. Itron's return on equity of 18.23% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.91, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.55%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Itron has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.439%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $607.2M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.9M. Itron's net income of $65.5M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of $906K. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 2.30x versus 2.41x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Itron's net margin of 81.39%. Itron's return on equity of 18.23% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.91, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Itron has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.665%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $607.2M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Itron's net income of $65.5M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 2.30x versus 2.70x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Itron's net margin of 19.68%. Itron's return on equity of 18.23% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.91, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $183.44 which suggests that it could grow by 15.97%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Itron.

Itron has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.171%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $607.2M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Itron's net income of $65.5M is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 37.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 2.30x versus 5.40x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.