ITRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Itron's net margin of 9.48%. Itron's return on equity of 17.69% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 3.19%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.38, signalling upside risk potential of 24.52%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Itron has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.203%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $612.9M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Itron's net income of $58.1M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of $238K. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.06x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 1.97x versus 1.60x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Itron's net margin of -1.05%. Itron's return on equity of 17.69% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.38, signalling upside risk potential of 24.52%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.62%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Itron.

Itron has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.546, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.584%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $612.9M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $93.5M. Itron's net income of $58.1M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.06x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 1.97x versus 1.58x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Itron's net margin of 16.78%. Itron's return on equity of 17.69% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.38, signalling upside risk potential of 24.52%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Itron has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.621%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $612.9M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Itron's net income of $58.1M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.06x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 17.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 1.97x versus 2.22x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Itron's net margin of 13.02%. Itron's return on equity of 17.69% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Itron has a consensus price target of $129.38, signalling upside risk potential of 24.52%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $184.86 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Itron.

Itron has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.732%.

Itron has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itron pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Itron quarterly revenues are $612.9M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Itron's net income of $58.1M is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Itron's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.06x while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 42.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itron is 1.97x versus 5.16x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.