SWVL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avalon Holdings has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings's net margin of -9.33%. Swvl Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Avalon Holdings's return on equity of 2.2%.

Swvl Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -65.91%. On the other hand Avalon Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swvl Holdings has higher upside potential than Avalon Holdings, analysts believe Swvl Holdings is more attractive than Avalon Holdings.

Swvl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avalon Holdings has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.408%.

Swvl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avalon Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swvl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avalon Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Avalon Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.1M. Swvl Holdings's net income of $772.8K is higher than Avalon Holdings's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Swvl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avalon Holdings's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings is 2.36x versus 0.12x for Avalon Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compx International has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings's net margin of 12.74%. Swvl Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Compx International's return on equity of 11.54%.

Swvl Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -65.91%. On the other hand Compx International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Compx International has higher upside potential than Swvl Holdings, analysts believe Compx International is more attractive than Swvl Holdings.

Swvl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compx International has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.543%.

Swvl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compx International offers a yield of 4.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Swvl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compx International pays out 237.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Compx International quarterly revenues of $40.3M. Swvl Holdings's net income of $772.8K is lower than Compx International's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Swvl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compx International's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings is 2.36x versus 2.01x for Compx International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings's net margin of 5.54%. Swvl Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Swvl Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -65.91%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swvl Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Swvl Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Swvl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.265%.

Swvl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Swvl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Swvl Holdings's net income of $772.8K is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Swvl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings is 2.36x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings's net margin of -8.6%. Swvl Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Swvl Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -65.91%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.15%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Swvl Holdings, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Swvl Holdings.

Swvl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.

Swvl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swvl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Swvl Holdings's net income of $772.8K is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Swvl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 21.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings is 2.36x versus 0.50x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.