SMTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of -7747.5% compared to SmartKem's net margin of -12.42%. SmartKem's return on equity of -110.05% beat AXT's return on equity of -3.81%.

SmartKem has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 128.07%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than SmartKem, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than SmartKem.

SmartKem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.027%.

SmartKem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartKem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartKem quarterly revenues are $40K, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $23.6M. SmartKem's net income of -$2.8M is higher than AXT's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, SmartKem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartKem is -- versus 1.04x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of -7747.5% compared to SmartKem's net margin of 9.61%. SmartKem's return on equity of -110.05% beat Entegris's return on equity of 6.6%.

SmartKem has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.28%. Given that Entegris has higher upside potential than SmartKem, analysts believe Entegris is more attractive than SmartKem.

SmartKem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.523%.

SmartKem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SmartKem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 33.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SmartKem quarterly revenues are $40K, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $807.7M. SmartKem's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Entegris's net income of $77.6M. Notably, SmartKem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 67.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartKem is -- versus 4.84x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of -7747.5% compared to SmartKem's net margin of 9.01%. SmartKem's return on equity of -110.05% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

SmartKem has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 13.78%. Given that FormFactor has higher upside potential than SmartKem, analysts believe FormFactor is more attractive than SmartKem.

SmartKem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.61%.

SmartKem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartKem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartKem quarterly revenues are $40K, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. SmartKem's net income of -$2.8M is lower than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, SmartKem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 27.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartKem is -- versus 4.99x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -7747.5% compared to SmartKem's net margin of 1.64%. SmartKem's return on equity of -110.05% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

SmartKem has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.18%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than SmartKem, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than SmartKem.

SmartKem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.712%.

SmartKem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartKem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartKem quarterly revenues are $40K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. SmartKem's net income of -$2.8M is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, SmartKem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 39.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartKem is -- versus 0.87x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.