SLRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 90.08% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 99.99%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 8.85% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $16.58, signalling upside risk potential of 2.44%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that SLR Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe SLR Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.035%.

SLR Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. SLR Investment pays 93.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLR Investment quarterly revenues are $22.1M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. SLR Investment's net income of $19.9M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, SLR Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLR Investment is 9.10x versus 8.43x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Main Street Capital has a net margin of 90.08% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 83.2%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 8.85% beat Main Street Capital's return on equity of 19.26%.

SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $16.58, signalling upside risk potential of 2.44%. On the other hand Main Street Capital has an analysts' consensus of $55.75 which suggests that it could fall by -5.41%. Given that SLR Investment has higher upside potential than Main Street Capital, analysts believe SLR Investment is more attractive than Main Street Capital.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Main Street Capital has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.129%.

SLR Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Main Street Capital offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. SLR Investment pays 93.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital pays out 63.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLR Investment quarterly revenues are $22.1M, which are smaller than Main Street Capital quarterly revenues of $139.5M. SLR Investment's net income of $19.9M is lower than Main Street Capital's net income of $116.1M. Notably, SLR Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Main Street Capital's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLR Investment is 9.10x versus 8.29x for Main Street Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 90.08% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 95.41%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 8.85% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $16.58, signalling upside risk potential of 2.44%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 13.82%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than SLR Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than SLR Investment.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.59900000000001%.

SLR Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. SLR Investment pays 93.43% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. SLR Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

SLR Investment quarterly revenues are $22.1M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. SLR Investment's net income of $19.9M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, SLR Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLR Investment is 9.10x versus 9.14x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 90.08% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 90.2%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 8.85% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $16.58, signalling upside risk potential of 2.44%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could grow by 2.95%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than SLR Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than SLR Investment.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.353%.

SLR Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. SLR Investment pays 93.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. SLR Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

SLR Investment quarterly revenues are $22.1M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. SLR Investment's net income of $19.9M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, SLR Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 105.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLR Investment is 9.10x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.