SLNH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -76.24%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Soluna Holdings has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe Soluna Holdings is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.751, which suggesting that the stock is 275.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is lower than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.16x versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 7.22%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.93%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.751, which suggesting that the stock is 275.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.556%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 38.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.16x versus 10.30x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.67 which suggests that it could grow by 62.18%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.751, which suggesting that the stock is 275.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.16x versus 6.45x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 29.96%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Soluna Holdings has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Soluna Holdings is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.751, which suggesting that the stock is 275.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.243%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $28.9M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is lower than Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.16x versus 2.01x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.