SLDP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of -2.54%. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.9%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 177.78%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 12.71x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of 16.45%. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.1%.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.9%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $27.74 which suggests that it could grow by 18.69%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.832%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are smaller than Gentex quarterly revenues of $576.8M. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Gentex's net income of $94.9M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gentex's PE ratio is 13.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 12.71x versus 2.29x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of --. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.9%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.73%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 12.71x versus 161.80x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optec International has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of --. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Optec International's return on equity of --.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.9%. On the other hand Optec International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solid Power has higher upside potential than Optec International, analysts believe Solid Power is more attractive than Optec International.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optec International has a beta of 3.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.494%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optec International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optec International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are larger than Optec International quarterly revenues of --. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is higher than Optec International's net income of --. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optec International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 12.71x versus -- for Optec International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.