SGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of -69.07% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 3.57%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1185.25%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $114.62 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.385%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $474.6K, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 26.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.02x versus 0.70x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of -69.07% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of -5.75%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -132.48%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1185.25%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 61.52%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Forward Air, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Forward Air.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.007%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $474.6K, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $632.8M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$36.4M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.02x versus 0.23x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of -69.07% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 2.5%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.33%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1185.25%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $46.56 which suggests that it could grow by 22.5%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Hub Group.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.428%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $474.6K, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $973.5M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K is lower than Hub Group's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hub Group's PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.02x versus 0.59x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -69.07% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 2.45%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1185.25%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 55.01%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.749%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $474.6K, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 22.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.02x versus 0.35x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.