SGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of -460.08% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 3.34%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -29.48% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.81%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $109.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.946%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $363.1K, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4B. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$1.7M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 22.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.55x versus 0.67x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of -460.08% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of -8.26%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -29.48% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -158.26%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.81%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 90.7%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Forward Air, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Forward Air.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.986%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $363.1K, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $613.3M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.55x versus 0.19x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of -460.08% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 2.93%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -29.48% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.27%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.81%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Hub Group.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.12%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $363.1K, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Hub Group's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.55x versus 0.53x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -460.08% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 1.19%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -29.48% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.81%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.93%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.292%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $363.1K, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 16.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.55x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.