Where Will Henry Schein Stock Be in 5 Years?
If you’re looking at Henry Schein (NASDAQ: HSIC) and wondering…
Buy
52
SETM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.16
Seasonality move
:
-13.42%
Day range:
$14.75 - $15.23
52-week range:
$11.48 - $20.04
Dividend yield:
2.04%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
39.1K
Avg. volume:
17.3K
1-year change:
-20.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$15.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 2.04% | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$18.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.29% | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
$21.83 | -- | -- | -- | $2.15 | 9.85% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.17% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$5.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 7.86% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$62.18 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 3.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.001 | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.920 | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.033 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.130 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.510 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.211 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or AQWA?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or AQWA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Clean Water ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Clean Water ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Clean Water ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or AQWA More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or AQWA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Global X Clean Water ETF offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Clean Water ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or AQWA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Clean Water ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Clean Water ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or COPJ?
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or COPJ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or COPJ More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or COPJ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 9.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or COPJ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or CUT More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.536%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or LITP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or LITP More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or LITP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 7.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or LITP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or SLX?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or SLX More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or SLX?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or SLX?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Cisco Stock Forecast: Is It Ready to Surprise Us?
Let’s be real Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO) hasn’t exactly been…
Where Will Gartner Stock Be in 5 Years?
If you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to invest in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x
Sell
33
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Buy
60
MRUS alert for May 24
Merus NV [MRUS] is up 32.55% over the past day.
Buy
57
RGC alert for May 24
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.43% over the past day.
Buy
90
OKLO alert for May 24
Oklo [OKLO] is up 23.11% over the past day.
