Where Will Gartner Stock Be in 5 Years?
If you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to invest in…
Buy
53
LITP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.55
Seasonality move
:
-26.93%
Day range:
$5.49 - $5.64
52-week range:
$4.63 - $10.55
Dividend yield:
7.86%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19.8K
Avg. volume:
9.7K
1-year change:
-45.79%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$5.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 7.86% | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$18.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.29% | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
$21.83 | -- | -- | -- | $2.15 | 9.85% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.17% | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$15.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 2.04% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$62.18 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 3.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.510 | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.920 | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.033 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.130 | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.001 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.211 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LITP or AQWA?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LITP or AQWA?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Clean Water ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Clean Water ETF, analysts believe Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is more attractive than Global X Clean Water ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 -
Is LITP or AQWA More Risky?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LITP or AQWA?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.86%. Global X Clean Water ETF offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Clean Water ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LITP or AQWA?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Clean Water ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Clean Water ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LITP or COPJ?
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LITP or COPJ?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is LITP or COPJ More Risky?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LITP or COPJ?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.86%. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 9.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LITP or COPJ?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LITP or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LITP or CUT?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is LITP or CUT More Risky?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.536%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LITP or CUT?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.86%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LITP or CUT?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LITP or SETM?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LITP or SETM?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is more attractive than Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is LITP or SETM More Risky?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LITP or SETM?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.86%. Sprott Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LITP or SETM?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LITP or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LITP or SLX?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is LITP or SLX More Risky?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LITP or SLX?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.86%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LITP or SLX?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Rambus (RMBS) Stock Forecast, Can the Rally Continue in 2025?
Rambus has flown under the radar, but the numbers tell…
Celsius Stock Forecast: Will Earnings Spark Another Surge?
Energy drink seller Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH) has reported somewhat…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x
Sell
33
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Buy
60
MRUS alert for May 24
Merus NV [MRUS] is up 32.55% over the past day.
Buy
57
RGC alert for May 24
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.43% over the past day.
Buy
90
OKLO alert for May 24
Oklo [OKLO] is up 23.11% over the past day.
