SATS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of -3.65% compared to EchoStar's net margin of -128.16%. EchoStar's return on equity of -14.96% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -49.66%.

EchoStar has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.58 which suggests that it could grow by 74.27%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than EchoStar, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than EchoStar.

EchoStar has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.818%.

EchoStar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EchoStar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

EchoStar quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $115.8M. EchoStar's net income of -$141.8M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$148.4M. Notably, EchoStar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EchoStar is 0.46x versus 0.15x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of -3.65% compared to EchoStar's net margin of 11.09%. EchoStar's return on equity of -14.96% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14%.

EchoStar has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.94%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than EchoStar, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than EchoStar.

EchoStar has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.572%.

EchoStar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EchoStar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EchoStar quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $195.8M. EchoStar's net income of -$141.8M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $21.7M. Notably, EchoStar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmonic's PE ratio is 16.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EchoStar is 0.46x versus 2.29x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of -3.65% compared to EchoStar's net margin of -4.14%. EchoStar's return on equity of -14.96% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -12.87%.

EchoStar has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that KVH Industries has higher upside potential than EchoStar, analysts believe KVH Industries is more attractive than EchoStar.

EchoStar has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.624, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.561%.

EchoStar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EchoStar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EchoStar quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $29M. EchoStar's net income of -$141.8M is lower than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, EchoStar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EchoStar is 0.46x versus 0.97x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of -3.65% compared to EchoStar's net margin of -0.76%. EchoStar's return on equity of -14.96% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of -5.36%.

EchoStar has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could grow by 6.16%. Given that EchoStar has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe EchoStar is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

EchoStar has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.18%.

EchoStar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EchoStar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EchoStar quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $238.2M. EchoStar's net income of -$141.8M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, EchoStar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EchoStar is 0.46x versus 2.30x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.