Financhill
Sell
43

RUSHA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$49.65
Seasonality move :
4.84%
Day range:
$48.52 - $50.14
52-week range:
$40.99 - $65.43
Dividend yield:
1.47%
P/E ratio:
13.73x
P/S ratio:
0.52x
P/B ratio:
1.76x
Volume:
314.4K
Avg. volume:
515.6K
1-year change:
13.17%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
$7.8B
EPS (TTM):
$3.58

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises
$1.8B $0.72 -6.21% -20.62% $60.50
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
-- -- -- -- --
CASY
Casey's General Stores
$4B $1.96 10.69% 3.55% $452.56
FLWS
1-800-Flowers.com
$364.2M -$0.34 -8.36% -60.42% $9.00
ODP
The ODP
$1.7B $0.65 -7.3% 63.04% $29.33
TSCO
Tractor Supply
$3.5B $0.37 3.6% 2.09% $54.37
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises
$49.14 $60.50 $3.8B 13.73x $0.18 1.47% 0.52x
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
$1.20 -- $27.4M -- $0.05 39.58% 0.03x
CASY
Casey's General Stores
$440.51 $452.56 $16B 30.70x $0.50 0.45% 1.06x
FLWS
1-800-Flowers.com
$4.94 $9.00 $314M -- $0.00 0% 0.19x
ODP
The ODP
$16.33 $29.33 $491.2M 23.65x $0.00 0% 0.08x
TSCO
Tractor Supply
$48.97 $54.37 $26B 24.31x $0.23 1.84% 1.76x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises
40.65% 1.396 34.87% 0.31x
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
16.27% 1.495 139.75% 0.05x
CASY
Casey's General Stores
43.98% 0.551 17.47% 0.48x
FLWS
1-800-Flowers.com
33.11% 0.875 41.94% 0.58x
ODP
The ODP
25.05% -0.446 60.79% 0.42x
TSCO
Tractor Supply
48.2% 0.896 7.12% 0.09x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises
$357.8M $91.7M 7.92% 14.04% 4.94% $45.1M
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
$54.3M -$16.4M -37.68% -39.38% -9.36% -$16.9M
CASY
Casey's General Stores
$912.6M $137.2M 10.23% 16.85% 3.51% $90.7M
FLWS
1-800-Flowers.com
$105M -$55.2M -27.08% -38.44% -58.91% -$160M
ODP
The ODP
$360M $54M -4.29% -5.33% -1.88% $36M
TSCO
Tractor Supply
$1.3B $249.1M 26.49% 48.21% 7.19% $75.5M

Rush Enterprises vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RUSHA or BGFV?

    Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of -9.82%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 14.04% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    19.33% $0.73 $3.7B
    BGFV
    Big 5 Sporting Goods
    30.93% -$0.78 $189.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSHA or BGFV?

    Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    2 0 0
    BGFV
    Big 5 Sporting Goods
    0 0 0
  • Is RUSHA or BGFV More Risky?

    Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.938, which suggesting that the stock is 6.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.669%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSHA or BGFV?

    Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 39.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSHA or BGFV?

    Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Rush Enterprises's net income of $60.3M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.52x versus 0.03x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    0.52x 13.73x $1.9B $60.3M
    BGFV
    Big 5 Sporting Goods
    0.03x -- $175.6M -$17.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSHA or CASY?

    Casey's General Stores has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.23%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 14.04% beat Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    19.33% $0.73 $3.7B
    CASY
    Casey's General Stores
    23.38% $2.33 $6.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSHA or CASY?

    Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores has an analysts' consensus of $452.56 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that Rush Enterprises has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Rush Enterprises is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    2 0 0
    CASY
    Casey's General Stores
    11 4 0
  • Is RUSHA or CASY More Risky?

    Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.938, which suggesting that the stock is 6.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.181%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSHA or CASY?

    Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Casey's General Stores offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores pays out 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSHA or CASY?

    Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $60.3M is lower than Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Casey's General Stores's PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.52x versus 1.06x for Casey's General Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    0.52x 13.73x $1.9B $60.3M
    CASY
    Casey's General Stores
    1.06x 30.70x $3.9B $87.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSHA or FLWS?

    1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of -53.78%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 14.04% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    19.33% $0.73 $3.7B
    FLWS
    1-800-Flowers.com
    31.68% -$2.80 $475M
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSHA or FLWS?

    Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 82.19%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    2 0 0
    FLWS
    1-800-Flowers.com
    0 1 0
  • Is RUSHA or FLWS More Risky?

    Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.938, which suggesting that the stock is 6.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.336%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSHA or FLWS?

    Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSHA or FLWS?

    Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Rush Enterprises's net income of $60.3M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.52x versus 0.19x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    0.52x 13.73x $1.9B $60.3M
    FLWS
    1-800-Flowers.com
    0.19x -- $331.5M -$178.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSHA or ODP?

    The ODP has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of -1.71%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 14.04% beat The ODP's return on equity of -5.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    19.33% $0.73 $3.7B
    ODP
    The ODP
    21.19% -$0.97 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSHA or ODP?

    Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand The ODP has an analysts' consensus of $29.33 which suggests that it could grow by 89.84%. Given that The ODP has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe The ODP is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    2 0 0
    ODP
    The ODP
    1 1 0
  • Is RUSHA or ODP More Risky?

    Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.938, which suggesting that the stock is 6.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP has a beta of 1.286, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.577%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSHA or ODP?

    Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. The ODP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSHA or ODP?

    Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than The ODP quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $60.3M is higher than The ODP's net income of -$29M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while The ODP's PE ratio is 23.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.52x versus 0.08x for The ODP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    0.52x 13.73x $1.9B $60.3M
    ODP
    The ODP
    0.08x 23.65x $1.7B -$29M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSHA or TSCO?

    Tractor Supply has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 5.17%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 14.04% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    19.33% $0.73 $3.7B
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply
    36.21% $0.34 $4.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSHA or TSCO?

    Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $54.37 which suggests that it could grow by 11.03%. Given that Rush Enterprises has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Rush Enterprises is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    2 0 0
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply
    10 16 1
  • Is RUSHA or TSCO More Risky?

    Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.938, which suggesting that the stock is 6.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.661%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSHA or TSCO?

    Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSHA or TSCO?

    Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $60.3M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 24.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.52x versus 1.76x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSHA
    Rush Enterprises
    0.52x 13.73x $1.9B $60.3M
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply
    1.76x 24.31x $3.5B $179.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?

Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…

Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?

So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…

Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?

Cameco (NYSE: CCJ) isn’t exactly the kind of stock you…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 47x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
84
SBET alert for May 30

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 3.17% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 30

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Buy
73
CTEV alert for May 30

Claritev [CTEV] is up 7.82% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock