RIGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 22.46% compared to Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -49.65%. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 408.46%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Rigel Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Rigel Pharmaceuticals.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.372%.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rigel Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net income of $12.4M is higher than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Rigel Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.52x while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rigel Pharmaceuticals is 2.24x versus 0.08x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of 22.46% compared to Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31814.89%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Rigel Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Rigel Pharmaceuticals.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.712%.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rigel Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net income of $12.4M is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Rigel Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.52x while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rigel Pharmaceuticals is 2.24x versus 1.11x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of 22.46% compared to Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -2357.27%. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1503.77%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Rigel Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Rigel Pharmaceuticals.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.929%.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rigel Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net income of $12.4M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Rigel Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.52x while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rigel Pharmaceuticals is 2.24x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of 22.46% compared to Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6014.87%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Rigel Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Rigel Pharmaceuticals.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.367%.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rigel Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Rigel Pharmaceuticals's net income of $12.4M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Rigel Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.52x while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rigel Pharmaceuticals is 2.24x versus 1.59x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.