RDFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of -43.73%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.97, signalling downside risk potential of -7.72%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.01 which suggests that it could grow by 15.87%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.205%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 5.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.29x versus 7.15x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of 6.09%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.97, signalling downside risk potential of -7.72%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $22.74 which suggests that it could grow by 30.81%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.655%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $702.9M. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 43.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.29x versus 4.35x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of -7.37%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -47.14%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.97, signalling downside risk potential of -7.72%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $1.15 which suggests that it could grow by 100.65%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$85M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.29x versus 0.08x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of 33.23%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.97, signalling downside risk potential of -7.72%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $254.94 which suggests that it could grow by 11.9%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.737%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $664.2M. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.29x versus 9.16x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.