RDFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of -0.69%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling upside risk potential of 14.37%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 38.04%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.516% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.825%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 0.93x versus 0.40x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of 12.8%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling upside risk potential of 14.37%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Redfin has a beta of 2.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.516% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.644%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 75.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 0.93x versus 13.78x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of -5.67%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -40.82%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling upside risk potential of 14.37%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $1.91 which suggests that it could grow by 15.49%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.516% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is higher than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$78M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 0.93x versus 0.23x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of -2883.88%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling upside risk potential of 14.37%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Redfin has a beta of 2.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.516% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 0.93x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.