DOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 18.34%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $25.32, signalling upside risk potential of 27.19%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.94 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.594%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 7.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M is lower than Crown Castle's net income of $303M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.36x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 31.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 5.02x versus 5.77x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 38.73%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $25.32, signalling upside risk potential of 27.19%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $256.88 which suggests that it could grow by 31.13%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.399%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are larger than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $667.6M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.36x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 30.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 5.02x versus 7.97x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 75.97%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67% beat VICI Properties's return on equity of 10.93%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $25.32, signalling upside risk potential of 27.19%. On the other hand VICI Properties has an analysts' consensus of $35.76 which suggests that it could grow by 22.26%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than VICI Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties has a beta of 0.944, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. VICI Properties offers a yield of 5.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties pays out 63.01% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than VICI Properties quarterly revenues of $964.7M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M is lower than VICI Properties's net income of $732.9M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.36x while VICI Properties's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 5.02x versus 8.02x for VICI Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 1.67%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67% beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 5.29%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $25.32, signalling upside risk potential of 27.19%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $36.09 which suggests that it could grow by 28.85%. Given that Weyerhaeuser has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, analysts believe Weyerhaeuser is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.56%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 144.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $28M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.36x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 37.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 5.02x versus 2.84x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.