DOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of -43.73%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.79, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.11 which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Crown Castle, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Crown Castle.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.215%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.45%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.40x versus 7.30x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 33.23%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.79, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $254.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.65%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.015%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.45%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are larger than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $664.2M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 30.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.40x versus 9.23x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 55.23%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat VICI Properties's return on equity of 9.94%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.79, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand VICI Properties has an analysts' consensus of $36.08 which suggests that it could grow by 14.87%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than VICI Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.435%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.45%. VICI Properties offers a yield of 5.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties pays out 65.44% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are smaller than VICI Properties quarterly revenues of $984.2M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than VICI Properties's net income of $543.6M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while VICI Properties's PE ratio is 12.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.40x versus 8.53x for VICI Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 4.71%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 3.7%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.79, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $34.08 which suggests that it could grow by 26.35%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Weyerhaeuser, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Weyerhaeuser.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.284%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.45%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 172.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $83M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 53.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.40x versus 2.77x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.