PYCR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Paycor HCM's net margin of --. Paycor HCM's return on equity of -1.66% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Paycor HCM has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 48.75%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Paycor HCM, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Paycor HCM.

Paycor HCM has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Paycor HCM has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paycor HCM pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paycor HCM quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Paycor HCM's net income of -$2M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$193M. Notably, Paycor HCM's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paycor HCM is 5.72x versus 135.19x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Paycor HCM's net margin of 6.75%. Paycor HCM's return on equity of -1.66% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Paycor HCM has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 67.34%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Paycor HCM, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Paycor HCM.

Paycor HCM has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Paycor HCM has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paycor HCM pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paycor HCM quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Paycor HCM's net income of -$2M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Paycor HCM's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 37.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paycor HCM is 5.72x versus 1.95x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Paycor HCM's net margin of -65748.98%. Paycor HCM's return on equity of -1.66% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Paycor HCM has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Paycor HCM has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Paycor HCM is more attractive than Veea.

Paycor HCM has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Paycor HCM has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paycor HCM pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paycor HCM quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $50.7K. Paycor HCM's net income of -$2M is higher than Veea's net income of -$33.3M. Notably, Paycor HCM's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paycor HCM is 5.72x versus -- for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Paycor HCM's net margin of -30.09%. Paycor HCM's return on equity of -1.66% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63%.

Paycor HCM has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $29.08 which suggests that it could grow by 29.89%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Paycor HCM, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Paycor HCM.

Paycor HCM has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.226%.

Paycor HCM has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paycor HCM pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paycor HCM quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Paycor HCM's net income of -$2M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M. Notably, Paycor HCM's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 131.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paycor HCM is 5.72x versus 4.27x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.