PWOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eagle Financial Services has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of -162.83%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 4.6%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eagle Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.26%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.31%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Eagle Financial Services offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Financial Services pays out 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is higher than Eagle Financial Services's net income of -$7M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.56x while Eagle Financial Services's PE ratio is 15.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.16x versus 2.18x for Eagle Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 36.31%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.773%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penns Woods Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.56x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.16x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 32.4%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.96%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.656%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Park National offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.56x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.16x versus 5.00x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 24.09%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.08%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.302%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.56x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.16x versus 2.88x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.