PGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California BanCorp has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of -43.2%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.14%. On the other hand California BanCorp has an analysts' consensus of $19.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.06%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Peapack Gladstone Financial, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Peapack Gladstone Financial.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.087999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California BanCorp has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.031%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. California BanCorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. California BanCorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack Gladstone Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than California BanCorp quarterly revenues of $38.1M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is higher than California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while California BanCorp's PE ratio is 17.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.54x versus 3.14x for California BanCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 31.58%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.14%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.36%. Given that Peapack Gladstone Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Peapack Gladstone Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.087999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.076%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.54x versus 3.04x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Community West Bancshares has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Community West Bancshares's return on equity of 2.54%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.14%. On the other hand Community West Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $23.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.34%. Given that Community West Bancshares has higher upside potential than Peapack Gladstone Financial, analysts believe Community West Bancshares is more attractive than Peapack Gladstone Financial.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.087999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community West Bancshares has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.501%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Community West Bancshares offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Community West Bancshares pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than Community West Bancshares quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is higher than Community West Bancshares's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Community West Bancshares's PE ratio is 28.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.54x versus 2.77x for Community West Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.14%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that Peapack Gladstone Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Peapack Gladstone Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.087999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.54x versus 2.79x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.