BCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a net margin of 37.6% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 33.22%. California BanCorp's return on equity of 4.08% beat Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Burke & Herbert Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.5%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than California BanCorp, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than California BanCorp.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.907%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays out 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are smaller than Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues of $81.9M. California BanCorp's net income of $16.9M is lower than Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.42x while Burke & Herbert Financial Services's PE ratio is 16.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 2.82x versus 2.62x for Burke & Herbert Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 37.6% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 36.31%. California BanCorp's return on equity of 4.08% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. California BanCorp's net income of $16.9M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.42x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 2.82x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 37.6% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 32.4%. California BanCorp's return on equity of 4.08% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.5%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Park National.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.434%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. California BanCorp's net income of $16.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.42x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 2.82x versus 5.07x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 37.6% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 24.09%. California BanCorp's return on equity of 4.08% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. California BanCorp's net income of $16.9M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.42x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 2.82x versus 2.92x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.