BCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community West Bancshares has a net margin of -43.2% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 11.09%. California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1% beat Community West Bancshares's return on equity of 2.54%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Community West Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $23.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.34%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Community West Bancshares, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Community West Bancshares.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.031% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community West Bancshares has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.501%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Community West Bancshares offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Community West Bancshares pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Community West Bancshares's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $38.1M, which are larger than Community West Bancshares quarterly revenues of $30.5M. California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M is lower than Community West Bancshares's net income of $3.4M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.41x while Community West Bancshares's PE ratio is 28.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 3.14x versus 2.77x for Community West Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of -43.2% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 16.32%. California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.031% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $38.1M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.41x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 3.14x versus 2.79x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a net margin of -43.2% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 13.66%. California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1% beat Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Peapack Gladstone Financial has an analysts' consensus of $38.67 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Peapack Gladstone Financial, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Peapack Gladstone Financial.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.031% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.087999999999999%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peapack Gladstone Financial offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays out 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack Gladstone Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $38.1M, which are smaller than Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues of $55.6M. California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M is lower than Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.41x while Peapack Gladstone Financial's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 3.14x versus 2.54x for Peapack Gladstone Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -43.2% compared to California BanCorp's net margin of 27.77%. California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

California BanCorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.05%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Park National.

California BanCorp has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.031% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

California BanCorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. California BanCorp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California BanCorp quarterly revenues are $38.1M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, California BanCorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.41x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California BanCorp is 3.14x versus 5.58x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.