NXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enphase Energy has a net margin of 18.16% compared to NEXTracker's net margin of 12.02%. NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.99% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48%.

NEXTracker has a consensus price target of $51.87, signalling upside risk potential of 17.38%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $90.72 which suggests that it could grow by 42.44%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than NEXTracker, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than NEXTracker.

NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.681, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.141%.

NEXTracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NEXTracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NEXTracker quarterly revenues are $635.6M, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $380.9M. NEXTracker's net income of $115.4M is higher than Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M. Notably, NEXTracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.69x while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 144.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEXTracker is 2.34x versus 7.00x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Solar has a net margin of 18.16% compared to NEXTracker's net margin of 35.26%. NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.99% beat First Solar's return on equity of 17.96%.

NEXTracker has a consensus price target of $51.87, signalling upside risk potential of 17.38%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $266.81 which suggests that it could grow by 38.33%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than NEXTracker, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than NEXTracker.

NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.64%.

NEXTracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NEXTracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NEXTracker quarterly revenues are $635.6M, which are smaller than First Solar quarterly revenues of $887.7M. NEXTracker's net income of $115.4M is lower than First Solar's net income of $313M. Notably, NEXTracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.69x while First Solar's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEXTracker is 2.34x versus 5.38x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 18.16% compared to NEXTracker's net margin of -125.26%. NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.99% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

NEXTracker has a consensus price target of $51.87, signalling upside risk potential of 17.38%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.15 which suggests that it could grow by 12.39%. Given that NEXTracker has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NEXTracker is more attractive than Intel.

NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.671%.

NEXTracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NEXTracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

NEXTracker quarterly revenues are $635.6M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. NEXTracker's net income of $115.4M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, NEXTracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.69x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEXTracker is 2.34x versus 1.69x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IPG Photonics has a net margin of 18.16% compared to NEXTracker's net margin of -100.19%. NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.99% beat IPG Photonics's return on equity of -6.43%.

NEXTracker has a consensus price target of $51.87, signalling upside risk potential of 17.38%. On the other hand IPG Photonics has an analysts' consensus of $106.99 which suggests that it could grow by 14.79%. Given that NEXTracker has higher upside potential than IPG Photonics, analysts believe NEXTracker is more attractive than IPG Photonics.

NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IPG Photonics has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.737%.

NEXTracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IPG Photonics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NEXTracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IPG Photonics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NEXTracker quarterly revenues are $635.6M, which are larger than IPG Photonics quarterly revenues of $233.1M. NEXTracker's net income of $115.4M is higher than IPG Photonics's net income of -$233.6M. Notably, NEXTracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.69x while IPG Photonics's PE ratio is 22.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEXTracker is 2.34x versus 3.24x for IPG Photonics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.