FTCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -39.89%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.36%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling upside risk potential of 62.06%. On the other hand GLOBALFOUNDRIES has an analysts' consensus of $46.16 which suggests that it could grow by 45.97%. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues of $1.8B. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is higher than GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GLOBALFOUNDRIES's PE ratio is 29.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.68x versus 2.60x for GLOBALFOUNDRIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 26.8%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling upside risk potential of 62.06%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $803.24 which suggests that it could grow by 25.08%. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than KLA.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KLA's PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.68x versus 7.99x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 19.66%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling upside risk potential of 62.06%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $127.58 which suggests that it could grow by 84.01%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than FTC Solar.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.023%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.68x versus 2.51x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 7.31%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 4.39%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling upside risk potential of 62.06%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.29 which suggests that it could grow by 88.92%. Given that Shoals Technologies Group has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Shoals Technologies Group is more attractive than FTC Solar.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Shoals Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $107M. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Shoals Technologies Group's net income of $7.8M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shoals Technologies Group's PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.68x versus 1.41x for Shoals Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.