MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enovix has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -522.03%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Enovix's return on equity of -112.38%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.27%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 141.58%. Given that Enovix has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, analysts believe Enovix is more attractive than Microvast Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are larger than Enovix quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Enovix's net income of -$22.5M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.17x versus 92.60x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -485622.38%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -59.68%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.27%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.68%. Given that Ideal Power has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, analysts believe Ideal Power is more attractive than Microvast Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.376%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $550. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.17x versus 395.40x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -121.55%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.27%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Plug Power.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.272%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.17x versus 2.56x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of 0.72%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.27%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.04%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Microvast Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.274%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.17x versus 0.73x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.