ULBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Energy Industries has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of 6.11%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Advanced Energy Industries's return on equity of 6.24%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 153.62%. On the other hand Advanced Energy Industries has an analysts' consensus of $124.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.36%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Advanced Energy Industries, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Advanced Energy Industries.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Energy Industries has a beta of 1.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.851%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Energy Industries offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries pays out 28.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are smaller than Advanced Energy Industries quarterly revenues of $404.6M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is lower than Advanced Energy Industries's net income of $24.7M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Advanced Energy Industries's PE ratio is 61.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.54x versus 2.89x for Advanced Energy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -47998.78%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -57.04%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 153.62%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -16.44%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Ideal Power, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.368%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $5.4K. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.54x versus 480.97x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -147.12%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 153.62%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.87 which suggests that it could grow by 131%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Plug Power.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.686%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.54x versus 1.09x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -19.52%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.59%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 153.62%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Tecogen.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.531%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Tecogen's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.54x versus 4.34x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.