MULN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cenntro has a net margin of -951% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -263.84%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Cenntro's return on equity of -44.42%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cenntro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mullen Automotive has higher upside potential than Cenntro, analysts believe Mullen Automotive is more attractive than Cenntro.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cenntro has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.816%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cenntro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cenntro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $5M, which are larger than Cenntro quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Cenntro's net income of -$5.7M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cenntro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.96x for Cenntro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of -951% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of 1.16%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could fall by -2.33%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.843%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -951% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -3252.53%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5714186.29%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $5M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of $316K. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 81.65x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -951% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -3221.01%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 98.02%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.952%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $5M, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $640.9K. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.50x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.