MULN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -92.9%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -65.84%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5328.46%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.992%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $812.8K. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is lower than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 2.09x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of --. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of --.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9142758.06%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of --. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of --. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 44.77x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -169.41%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 7.57x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -1001.53%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.41%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 198.662%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is lower than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.38x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.