FFAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -92.9%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -65.84%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8347726.92%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5087.11%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Envirotech Vehicles, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Envirotech Vehicles.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.831%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $812.8K. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 49.03x versus 2.09x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -155.79%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8347726.92%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could fall by -8.42%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 49.03x versus 8.34x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -43.95%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8347726.92%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.34 which suggests that it could fall by -3.22%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 49.03x versus 3.12x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -1001.53%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8347726.92%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 94.18%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.828, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.819%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 49.03x versus 0.34x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.