MLKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -1.45% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.26%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.98%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.912%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $876.2M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.17x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.33x versus 0.45x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -1.45% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of -2.54%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 207.69%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than MillerKnoll, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than MillerKnoll.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $876.2M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.17x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.33x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.45% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of -3528.43%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.87%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $876.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.17x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.33x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -1.45% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of --. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Northann.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $876.2M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.17x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.33x versus 1.68x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.