MLKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 3.8%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -5.58%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 69.26%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.08%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.269%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.45x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.37x versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of -23.71%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 69.26%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 259.71%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than MillerKnoll, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than MillerKnoll.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.501%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.45x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.37x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of --. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 69.26%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.45x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.37x versus 145.53x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of --. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 69.26%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Northann.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.45x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.37x versus 0.37x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.