MIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cepton has a net margin of 10.67% compared to MIND Technology's net margin of -1945.52%. MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13% beat Cepton's return on equity of --.

MIND Technology has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Cepton has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.46%. Given that MIND Technology has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe MIND Technology is more attractive than Cepton.

MIND Technology has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cepton has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MIND Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cepton offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MIND Technology pays 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Cepton pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MIND Technology quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are larger than Cepton quarterly revenues of $547K. MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M is higher than Cepton's net income of -$10.6M. Notably, MIND Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Cepton's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MIND Technology is 0.39x versus 2.90x for Cepton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genasys has a net margin of 10.67% compared to MIND Technology's net margin of -168.91%. MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13% beat Genasys's return on equity of -102.17%.

MIND Technology has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Genasys has an analysts' consensus of $5.33 which suggests that it could grow by 87.13%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than MIND Technology, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than MIND Technology.

MIND Technology has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genasys has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.529%.

MIND Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MIND Technology pays 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Genasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MIND Technology quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are larger than Genasys quarterly revenues of $6.7M. MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M is higher than Genasys's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, MIND Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Genasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MIND Technology is 0.39x versus 5.26x for Genasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sobr Safe has a net margin of 10.67% compared to MIND Technology's net margin of -3991.43%. MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13% beat Sobr Safe's return on equity of -351.33%.

MIND Technology has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Sobr Safe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48051.25%. Given that Sobr Safe has higher upside potential than MIND Technology, analysts believe Sobr Safe is more attractive than MIND Technology.

MIND Technology has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sobr Safe has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.274%.

MIND Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sobr Safe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MIND Technology pays 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Sobr Safe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MIND Technology quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are larger than Sobr Safe quarterly revenues of $46.1K. MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M is higher than Sobr Safe's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, MIND Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Sobr Safe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MIND Technology is 0.39x versus 1.13x for Sobr Safe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teledyne Technologies has a net margin of 10.67% compared to MIND Technology's net margin of 18.15%. MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13% beat Teledyne Technologies's return on equity of 10.21%.

MIND Technology has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Teledyne Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $537.94 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Teledyne Technologies has higher upside potential than MIND Technology, analysts believe Teledyne Technologies is more attractive than MIND Technology.

MIND Technology has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teledyne Technologies has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.329%.

MIND Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teledyne Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MIND Technology pays 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Teledyne Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MIND Technology quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are smaller than Teledyne Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M is lower than Teledyne Technologies's net income of $262M. Notably, MIND Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Teledyne Technologies's PE ratio is 23.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MIND Technology is 0.39x versus 3.89x for Teledyne Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.