GNSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cepton has a net margin of -168.91% compared to Genasys's net margin of -1945.52%. Genasys's return on equity of -102.17% beat Cepton's return on equity of --.

Genasys has a consensus price target of $5.33, signalling upside risk potential of 87.13%. On the other hand Cepton has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.46%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than Cepton.

Genasys has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cepton has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Genasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cepton offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cepton pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genasys quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are larger than Cepton quarterly revenues of $547K. Genasys's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Cepton's net income of -$10.6M. Notably, Genasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cepton's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genasys is 5.26x versus 2.90x for Cepton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND Technology has a net margin of -168.91% compared to Genasys's net margin of 10.67%. Genasys's return on equity of -102.17% beat MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13%.

Genasys has a consensus price target of $5.33, signalling upside risk potential of 87.13%. On the other hand MIND Technology has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.35%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than MIND Technology, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than MIND Technology.

Genasys has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND Technology has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.082%.

Genasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND Technology pays out 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Genasys quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are smaller than MIND Technology quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Genasys's net income of -$11.4M is lower than MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Genasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND Technology's PE ratio is 2.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genasys is 5.26x versus 0.39x for MIND Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sobr Safe has a net margin of -168.91% compared to Genasys's net margin of -3991.43%. Genasys's return on equity of -102.17% beat Sobr Safe's return on equity of -351.33%.

Genasys has a consensus price target of $5.33, signalling upside risk potential of 87.13%. On the other hand Sobr Safe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48051.25%. Given that Sobr Safe has higher upside potential than Genasys, analysts believe Sobr Safe is more attractive than Genasys.

Genasys has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sobr Safe has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.274%.

Genasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sobr Safe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sobr Safe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genasys quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are larger than Sobr Safe quarterly revenues of $46.1K. Genasys's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Sobr Safe's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Genasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sobr Safe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genasys is 5.26x versus 1.13x for Sobr Safe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teledyne Technologies has a net margin of -168.91% compared to Genasys's net margin of 18.15%. Genasys's return on equity of -102.17% beat Teledyne Technologies's return on equity of 10.21%.

Genasys has a consensus price target of $5.33, signalling upside risk potential of 87.13%. On the other hand Teledyne Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $537.94 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than Teledyne Technologies, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than Teledyne Technologies.

Genasys has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teledyne Technologies has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.329%.

Genasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teledyne Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teledyne Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genasys quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are smaller than Teledyne Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Genasys's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Teledyne Technologies's net income of $262M. Notably, Genasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teledyne Technologies's PE ratio is 23.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genasys is 5.26x versus 3.89x for Teledyne Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.