LOCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 4.47%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 42.05%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.15%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $56.22 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.822%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $921M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $41.2M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 16.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.66x versus 0.71x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of -1.49%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.15%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $95.33 which suggests that it could grow by 77.7%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than El Pollo Loco Holdings, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than El Pollo Loco Holdings.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.252%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.5M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.66x versus 2.41x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 8.06%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.15%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $191.57 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.222%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.66x versus 2.15x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 16.53%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.15%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $312.51 which suggests that it could grow by 32.44%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Wingstop.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.691%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 63.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.66x versus 11.08x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.