TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.55%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 41.51%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $181.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Cheesecake Factory has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Cheesecake Factory is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.267% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.617%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $927.2M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.14x versus 0.68x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 2.53%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $181.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global has an analysts' consensus of $27.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.46%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.267% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.496%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Dine Brands Global offers a yield of 10.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues of $204.8M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is higher than Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Dine Brands Global's PE ratio is 4.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.14x versus 0.37x for Dine Brands Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 8.36%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $181.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $164.27 which suggests that it could grow by 18.28%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.267% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.618%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 19.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.14x versus 1.25x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of -13.92%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $181.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $9.45 which suggests that it could grow by 247.43%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.267% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.137%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $285.2M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$39.7M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.14x versus 0.03x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.