TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.55%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 41.51%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $186.83, signalling downside risk potential of -4.24%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $55.41 which suggests that it could fall by -2.89%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has more downside risk than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Cheesecake Factory is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.09%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $927.2M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.11x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 17.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.37x versus 0.78x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 8.36%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $186.83, signalling downside risk potential of -4.24%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $164.83 which suggests that it could fall by -5%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.92%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.11x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 23.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.37x versus 1.56x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of -5.83%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.55%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $186.83, signalling downside risk potential of -4.24%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $64.44 which suggests that it could fall by -16.42%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has more downside risk than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.218%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.11x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.37x versus 3.43x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 0.32%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92% beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $186.83, signalling downside risk potential of -4.24%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 64.04%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.028%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $392.4M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.11x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.37x versus 0.08x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.