LNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Casinos has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -15.8%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98% beat Century Casinos's return on equity of -104.1%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $110.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.12%. On the other hand Century Casinos has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 83.82%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Casinos has a beta of 2.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.869%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Casinos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Casinos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $774M, which are larger than Century Casinos quarterly revenues of $130.4M. Light & Wonder's net income of $82M is higher than Century Casinos's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.42x while Century Casinos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.56x versus 0.11x for Century Casinos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -2.4%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $110.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.12%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $53.27 which suggests that it could grow by 49.84%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.505%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $774M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Light & Wonder's net income of $82M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.42x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.56x versus 3.53x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -0.17%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $110.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.12%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $12.20 which suggests that it could grow by 52.58%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.025%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $774M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $60.4M. Light & Wonder's net income of $82M is higher than Inspired Entertainment's net income of -$100K. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.42x while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 3.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.56x versus 0.79x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -48.38%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -451.9%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $110.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.12%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Light & Wonder has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Light & Wonder is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $774M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $6.8M. Light & Wonder's net income of $82M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.42x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.56x versus 0.74x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.