IRDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globalstar has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -28.87%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Globalstar's return on equity of -18.12%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 34.86%. On the other hand Globalstar has an analysts' consensus of $52.50 which suggests that it could grow by 139.18%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than Iridium Communications, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than Iridium Communications.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globalstar has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.027%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Globalstar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Globalstar pays out -16.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are larger than Globalstar quarterly revenues of $60M. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Globalstar's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.77x while Globalstar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.96x versus 10.93x for Globalstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -6.32%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 34.86%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 22.98%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.77x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.96x versus 0.31x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -6.19%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 34.86%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $19.88 which suggests that it could grow by 16.28%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Magnite.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.839, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 183.893%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.77x while Magnite's PE ratio is 85.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.96x versus 3.78x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sirius XM Holdings has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 9.87%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Sirius XM Holdings's return on equity of -28.77%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 34.86%. On the other hand Sirius XM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $23.81 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Sirius XM Holdings, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Sirius XM Holdings.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sirius XM Holdings has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.07%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Sirius XM Holdings offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Sirius XM Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is lower than Sirius XM Holdings's net income of $204M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.77x while Sirius XM Holdings's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.96x versus 0.88x for Sirius XM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.