GSAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Arena Group Holdings has a net margin of -28.87% compared to Globalstar's net margin of 12.64%. Globalstar's return on equity of -18.12% beat The Arena Group Holdings's return on equity of --.

Globalstar has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 184.4%. On the other hand The Arena Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 157.61%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than The Arena Group Holdings, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than The Arena Group Holdings.

Globalstar has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Arena Group Holdings has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.426%.

Globalstar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Arena Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Globalstar pays -16.84% of its earnings as a dividend. The Arena Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Globalstar quarterly revenues are $60M, which are larger than The Arena Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Globalstar's net income of -$17.3M is lower than The Arena Group Holdings's net income of $4M. Notably, Globalstar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Arena Group Holdings's PE ratio is 85.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globalstar is 9.19x versus 1.34x for The Arena Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iridium Communications has a net margin of -28.87% compared to Globalstar's net margin of 14.15%. Globalstar's return on equity of -18.12% beat Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17%.

Globalstar has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 184.4%. On the other hand Iridium Communications has an analysts' consensus of $38.63 which suggests that it could grow by 52.07%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than Iridium Communications, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than Iridium Communications.

Globalstar has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.727%.

Globalstar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iridium Communications offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Globalstar pays -16.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications pays out 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Globalstar quarterly revenues are $60M, which are smaller than Iridium Communications quarterly revenues of $214.9M. Globalstar's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M. Notably, Globalstar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Iridium Communications's PE ratio is 23.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globalstar is 9.19x versus 3.51x for Iridium Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sirius XM Holdings has a net margin of -28.87% compared to Globalstar's net margin of 9.87%. Globalstar's return on equity of -18.12% beat Sirius XM Holdings's return on equity of -28.77%.

Globalstar has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 184.4%. On the other hand Sirius XM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $23.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than Sirius XM Holdings, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than Sirius XM Holdings.

Globalstar has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sirius XM Holdings has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.572%.

Globalstar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sirius XM Holdings offers a yield of 4.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Globalstar pays -16.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Globalstar quarterly revenues are $60M, which are smaller than Sirius XM Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Globalstar's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Sirius XM Holdings's net income of $204M. Notably, Globalstar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sirius XM Holdings's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globalstar is 9.19x versus 0.90x for Sirius XM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kartoon Studios has a net margin of -28.87% compared to Globalstar's net margin of -68.67%. Globalstar's return on equity of -18.12% beat Kartoon Studios's return on equity of -50.51%.

Globalstar has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 184.4%. On the other hand Kartoon Studios has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5358.52%. Given that Kartoon Studios has higher upside potential than Globalstar, analysts believe Kartoon Studios is more attractive than Globalstar.

Globalstar has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kartoon Studios has a beta of 3.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 234.58%.

Globalstar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kartoon Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Globalstar pays -16.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Kartoon Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Globalstar quarterly revenues are $60M, which are larger than Kartoon Studios quarterly revenues of $9.5M. Globalstar's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Kartoon Studios's net income of -$6.5M. Notably, Globalstar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kartoon Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globalstar is 9.19x versus 0.94x for Kartoon Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.