GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 10.97%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.87%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.145%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $826M, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. Garrett Motion's net income of $52M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 21.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.61x versus 2.05x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 20.14%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Gentex's return on equity of 18.42%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $34.38 which suggests that it could grow by 22.92%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Gentex.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.712%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Gentex offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Garrett Motion pays 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 26.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $826M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $608.5M. Garrett Motion's net income of $52M is lower than Gentex's net income of $122.5M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Gentex's PE ratio is 14.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.61x versus 2.71x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 1.87%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $28.75 which suggests that it could grow by 32.86%. Given that Monro has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe Monro is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.389%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Monro offers a yield of 5.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Garrett Motion pays 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $826M, which are larger than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. Garrett Motion's net income of $52M is higher than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Monro's PE ratio is 24.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.61x versus 0.56x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OmniTek Engineering has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -11.84%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat OmniTek Engineering's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand OmniTek Engineering has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4981.3%. Given that OmniTek Engineering has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe OmniTek Engineering is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OmniTek Engineering has a beta of -0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.73%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. OmniTek Engineering offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. OmniTek Engineering pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $826M, which are larger than OmniTek Engineering quarterly revenues of $277.4K. Garrett Motion's net income of $52M is higher than OmniTek Engineering's net income of -$32.8K. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while OmniTek Engineering's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.61x versus 0.48x for OmniTek Engineering. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.