GEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of -10.53%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of 0% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Elm Group has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Great Elm Group is more attractive than Cohen &.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.197%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohen & offers a yield of 15.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -1451.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $18.5M. Great Elm Group's net income of $1.2M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.21x versus 0.46x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 61.13%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of 0% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 8.57%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.12%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.03%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 13.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Great Elm Group's net income of $1.2M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $16.3M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 13.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.21x versus 9.27x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PhenixFIN has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 54.65%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of 0% beat PhenixFIN's return on equity of 10.58%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PhenixFIN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.48%. Given that PhenixFIN has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe PhenixFIN is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PhenixFIN has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.183%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PhenixFIN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN pays out 14.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than PhenixFIN quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Great Elm Group's net income of $1.2M is lower than PhenixFIN's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PhenixFIN's PE ratio is 6.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.21x versus 3.97x for PhenixFIN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 96.31%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of 0% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Elm Group has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe Great Elm Group is more attractive than Rand Capital.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.263%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 8.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Great Elm Group's net income of $1.2M is lower than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.21x versus 3.38x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.