FSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of -2.16% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 4.32%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 19.64%.

L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.57%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.7%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.561%.

L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are smaller than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $476.6M. L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $20.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.82x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 18.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.42x versus 0.80x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of -2.16% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.22%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.57%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than EVI Industries.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.611%.

L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $92.7M. L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $1.1M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.82x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 37.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.42x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial has a net margin of -2.16% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 4.24%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27%.

L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.57%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.95%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Global Industrial, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Global Industrial.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.095%.

L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are smaller than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $321M. L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.82x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 17.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.42x versus 0.79x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of -2.16% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of -0.49%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77%.

L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.57%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.62%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.166%.

L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.82x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.42x versus 0.16x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.