FISI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 29.7% compared to Financial Institutions's net margin of 20.42%. Financial Institutions's return on equity of -5.22% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Financial Institutions has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.1%. Given that Financial Institutions has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Financial Institutions is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Financial Institutions has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.224%.

Financial Institutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Financial Institutions pays -47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Financial Institutions quarterly revenues are $56.8M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Financial Institutions's net income of $16.9M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Financial Institutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Institutions is 3.62x versus 3.16x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 29.7% compared to Financial Institutions's net margin of 36.31%. Financial Institutions's return on equity of -5.22% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Financial Institutions has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.06%. Given that Financial Institutions has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe Financial Institutions is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

Financial Institutions has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

Financial Institutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Financial Institutions pays -47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Financial Institutions quarterly revenues are $56.8M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Financial Institutions's net income of $16.9M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Financial Institutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Institutions is 3.62x versus 1.20x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 29.7% compared to Financial Institutions's net margin of 32.4%. Financial Institutions's return on equity of -5.22% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Financial Institutions has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.21%. Given that Financial Institutions has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Financial Institutions is more attractive than Park National.

Financial Institutions has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.434%.

Financial Institutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Park National offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Financial Institutions pays -47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Financial Institutions quarterly revenues are $56.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Financial Institutions's net income of $16.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Financial Institutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Institutions is 3.62x versus 4.85x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 29.7% compared to Financial Institutions's net margin of 24.09%. Financial Institutions's return on equity of -5.22% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Financial Institutions has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.06%. Given that Financial Institutions has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Financial Institutions is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Financial Institutions has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

Financial Institutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Financial Institutions pays -47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Financial Institutions quarterly revenues are $56.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Financial Institutions's net income of $16.9M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Financial Institutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Institutions is 3.62x versus 2.88x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.