FBIZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Busey has a net margin of 27.36% compared to First Business Financial Services's net margin of -24%. First Business Financial Services's return on equity of 14.74% beat First Busey's return on equity of 3.79%.

First Business Financial Services has a consensus price target of $58.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand First Busey has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that First Business Financial Services has higher upside potential than First Busey, analysts believe First Business Financial Services is more attractive than First Busey.

First Business Financial Services has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Busey has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.606%.

First Business Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. First Busey offers a yield of 4.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. First Business Financial Services pays 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. First Busey pays out 47.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Business Financial Services quarterly revenues are $40.8M, which are smaller than First Busey quarterly revenues of $125M. First Business Financial Services's net income of $11.2M is higher than First Busey's net income of -$30M. Notably, First Business Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while First Busey's PE ratio is 21.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Business Financial Services is 2.53x versus 2.87x for First Busey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) has a net margin of 27.36% compared to First Business Financial Services's net margin of --. First Business Financial Services's return on equity of 14.74% beat Evans Bancorp(DELISTED)'s return on equity of --.

First Business Financial Services has a consensus price target of $58.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Business Financial Services has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp(DELISTED), analysts believe First Business Financial Services is more attractive than Evans Bancorp(DELISTED).

First Business Financial Services has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.224%.

First Business Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First Business Financial Services pays 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Business Financial Services quarterly revenues are $40.8M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp(DELISTED) quarterly revenues of --. First Business Financial Services's net income of $11.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp(DELISTED)'s net income of --. Notably, First Business Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Evans Bancorp(DELISTED)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Business Financial Services is 2.53x versus -- for Evans Bancorp(DELISTED). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 27.36% compared to First Business Financial Services's net margin of 32.4%. First Business Financial Services's return on equity of 14.74% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

First Business Financial Services has a consensus price target of $58.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.19%. Given that First Business Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe First Business Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

First Business Financial Services has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.434%.

First Business Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Park National offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. First Business Financial Services pays 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Business Financial Services quarterly revenues are $40.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. First Business Financial Services's net income of $11.2M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, First Business Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Business Financial Services is 2.53x versus 5.18x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wintrust Financial has a net margin of 27.36% compared to First Business Financial Services's net margin of 29.39%. First Business Financial Services's return on equity of 14.74% beat Wintrust Financial's return on equity of 11.49%.

First Business Financial Services has a consensus price target of $58.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Wintrust Financial has an analysts' consensus of $136.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.88%. Given that First Business Financial Services has higher upside potential than Wintrust Financial, analysts believe First Business Financial Services is more attractive than Wintrust Financial.

First Business Financial Services has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wintrust Financial has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.973%.

First Business Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Wintrust Financial offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. First Business Financial Services pays 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Wintrust Financial pays out 20.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Business Financial Services quarterly revenues are $40.8M, which are smaller than Wintrust Financial quarterly revenues of $643.1M. First Business Financial Services's net income of $11.2M is lower than Wintrust Financial's net income of $189M. Notably, First Business Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Wintrust Financial's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Business Financial Services is 2.53x versus 3.24x for Wintrust Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.