EVER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cars.com has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of -1.12%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 39.17%. On the other hand Cars.com has an analysts' consensus of $16.21 which suggests that it could grow by 58.34%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than EverQuote.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.336%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cars.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cars.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Cars.com quarterly revenues of $179M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is higher than Cars.com's net income of -$2M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Cars.com's PE ratio is 15.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.58x versus 0.95x for Cars.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shutterstock has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 7.7%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Shutterstock's return on equity of 7.26%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 39.17%. On the other hand Shutterstock has an analysts' consensus of $26.93 which suggests that it could grow by 51.09%. Given that Shutterstock has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Shutterstock is more attractive than EverQuote.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shutterstock has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.003%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shutterstock offers a yield of 7.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shutterstock pays out 117.95% of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Shutterstock quarterly revenues of $242.6M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is lower than Shutterstock's net income of $18.7M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Shutterstock's PE ratio is 16.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.58x versus 0.66x for Shutterstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 13.69%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 309.82%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 39.17%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 107.67%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than EverQuote.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.004%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are larger than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $23.1M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is higher than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.58x versus 1.85x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upwork has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 19.58%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Upwork's return on equity of 51.26%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 39.17%. On the other hand Upwork has an analysts' consensus of $19.10 which suggests that it could grow by 39.11%. Given that EverQuote has higher upside potential than Upwork, analysts believe EverQuote is more attractive than Upwork.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upwork has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.083%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upwork offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upwork pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Upwork quarterly revenues of $192.7M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is lower than Upwork's net income of $37.7M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Upwork's PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.58x versus 2.54x for Upwork. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.