CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 11.68%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -38.65%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.121%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $20.2M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 23.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.19x versus 1.56x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -0.48%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -27.93%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CPS Technologies has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe CPS Technologies is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$25K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.19x versus 0.43x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -32.18%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 822%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.088%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $2.7M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.19x versus 1.17x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 485.94%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 330.016%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.19x versus 0.05x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.