CMPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of -37.01% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -82.25%. CompoSecure's return on equity of -- beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $15.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.97%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21516336.48%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than CompoSecure, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than CompoSecure.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.891%.

CompoSecure has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CompoSecure pays -16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

CompoSecure quarterly revenues are $100.9M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. CompoSecure's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, CompoSecure's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure is 2.16x versus 0.01x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of -37.01% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of 17.36%. CompoSecure's return on equity of -- beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26%.

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $15.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.97%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CompoSecure has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe CompoSecure is more attractive than Omega Flex.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.726%.

CompoSecure has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. CompoSecure pays -16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CompoSecure quarterly revenues are $100.9M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $27M. CompoSecure's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M. Notably, CompoSecure's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure is 2.16x versus 3.51x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of -37.01% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of 1.44%. CompoSecure's return on equity of -- beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $15.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.97%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 47.95%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than CompoSecure, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than CompoSecure.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.14%.

CompoSecure has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CompoSecure pays -16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CompoSecure quarterly revenues are $100.9M, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. CompoSecure's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, CompoSecure's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 14.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure is 2.16x versus 0.86x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ToughBuilt Industries has a net margin of -37.01% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of --. CompoSecure's return on equity of -- beat ToughBuilt Industries's return on equity of --.

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $15.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.97%. On the other hand ToughBuilt Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6241.47%. Given that ToughBuilt Industries has higher upside potential than CompoSecure, analysts believe ToughBuilt Industries is more attractive than CompoSecure.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ToughBuilt Industries has a beta of 2.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.306%.

CompoSecure has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ToughBuilt Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CompoSecure pays -16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. ToughBuilt Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CompoSecure quarterly revenues are $100.9M, which are larger than ToughBuilt Industries quarterly revenues of --. CompoSecure's net income of -$37.3M is higher than ToughBuilt Industries's net income of --. Notably, CompoSecure's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while ToughBuilt Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure is 2.16x versus 0.01x for ToughBuilt Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.