BLKB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 19.59%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $82.40, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $321.88 which suggests that it could grow by 10.05%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.6%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.40x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 76.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.49x versus 18.36x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 6.67%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $82.40, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $175.87 which suggests that it could grow by 12.66%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.651, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.928%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are larger than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $233.3M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is higher than CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.40x while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 39.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.49x versus 7.83x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 10.87%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 20.2%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $82.40, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $213.27 which suggests that it could grow by 12.15%. Given that Paylocity Holding has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Paylocity Holding is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.732%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $317.6M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.40x while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 52.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.49x versus 7.72x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZoomInfo Technologies has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 7.84%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat ZoomInfo Technologies's return on equity of 0.45%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $82.40, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand ZoomInfo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.49%. Given that ZoomInfo Technologies has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe ZoomInfo Technologies is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZoomInfo Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZoomInfo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZoomInfo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are smaller than ZoomInfo Technologies quarterly revenues of $303.6M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is lower than ZoomInfo Technologies's net income of $23.8M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.40x while ZoomInfo Technologies's PE ratio is 326.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.49x versus 2.99x for ZoomInfo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.