BLKB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ansys has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 32.05%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Ansys's return on equity of 10.17%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Ansys has an analysts' consensus of $356.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than Ansys.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ansys has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.883%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ansys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ansys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are smaller than Ansys quarterly revenues of $882.2M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Ansys's net income of $282.7M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Ansys's PE ratio is 49.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.87x versus 11.22x for Ansys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 4.2%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 65.85%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $179.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.98%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.189%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $262.6M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than CommVault Systems's net income of $11M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 42.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.87x versus 7.68x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 18.77%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $244.10 which suggests that it could grow by 38.97%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.871%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $255.8M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 50.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.87x versus 10.48x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith Micro Software has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of -88.35%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Smith Micro Software's return on equity of -100.51%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Smith Micro Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 548.33%. Given that Smith Micro Software has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Smith Micro Software is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.46% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith Micro Software has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.45%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith Micro Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith Micro Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than Smith Micro Software quarterly revenues of $5M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Smith Micro Software's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Smith Micro Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.87x versus 0.45x for Smith Micro Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.