ASTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 6.29%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $144.34 which suggests that it could grow by 54.54%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 2.293, which suggesting that the stock is 129.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 94.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 24.15x versus 5.93x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amkor Technology has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 6.49%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity of 8.64%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amkor Technology has an analysts' consensus of $29.05 which suggests that it could grow by 75.62%. Given that Amkor Technology has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe Amkor Technology is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 2.293, which suggesting that the stock is 129.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amkor Technology has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.321%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amkor Technology offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 50.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than Amkor Technology quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Amkor Technology's net income of $105.6M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amkor Technology's PE ratio is 11.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 24.15x versus 0.65x for Amkor Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 4.11%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.92%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 110.76%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 2.293, which suggesting that the stock is 129.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.700, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.048%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $36.6M. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than inTest's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 26.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 24.15x versus 0.56x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEXTracker has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 16.97%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.89%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEXTracker has an analysts' consensus of $54.96 which suggests that it could grow by 40.09%. Given that NEXTracker has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe NEXTracker is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 2.293, which suggesting that the stock is 129.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NEXTracker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEXTracker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than NEXTracker quarterly revenues of $679.4M. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than NEXTracker's net income of $115.3M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NEXTracker's PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 24.15x versus 2.11x for NEXTracker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.