AMAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of -1.97%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -4.28%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.118%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amalgamated Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $22.1M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of -$434K. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 2.96x versus 2.85x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 36.31%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amalgamated Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 2.96x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 32.4%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.5%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.434%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Park National offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 2.96x versus 5.07x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 24.09%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Amalgamated Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Amalgamated Financial.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 2.96x versus 2.92x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.